Does Russophobia have an ethnic origin? It might have several. Followed by a preliminary note on the Russian parliamentary elections,

Today I received a link to this piece in the New York Times. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/03/opinion/russia-20-years-along.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all?src=tp

Although one can dismiss this off hand as usual Russophobe drivel from the American equivalent of Völkischer Beobachter (the equivalent of the Stürmer is based in Washington, DC, and it is called the Post) there are a few comments that I wanted to make lest people think that Ariel Cohen is a blue-blooded American who is somehow concerned with the fate of democracy in Russia. Notice the ugly illustrations that somehow alludes that Russia is Communist. 

Hello everyone, 


A few important points to make about this peace and its authorship.

Arial Cohen is Russian. He is a Russian Jew whose native language is  Russian, not American English.  He blogs in Russian and his language,  frankly, is flithy. He is in employ of   a fascist taxpayer funded and CIA-affiliated Heritage foundation.


Arial Cohen is also an active Zionist and writes on Israeli issues.  His beef with Russia is partially of Middle Eastern origin. For example he  is now  upset with Russia selling missiles to Syria.  



Although Russophobia in the US foreign policy is primarily Jewish driven, its roots are historic and to me  are not absolutely clear.    Hilaire Belloc wrote about this among other authors of repute, but wait, here  I just finished reading a work by Robert Crozier Long titled The Colors  of War. Robert Crozier Long was an Associate Press front line  correspondent in Russia during the First World War - he might have even  stayed in Russia at the time of the Bolshevist putsch that destroyed the country for good in 1917.  The Colors of War was published in 1915 and  consists of war reportage all written in the 1914. There is a phrase I  recall (the fighting was going on in Poland at the time) and there the Germans capture the town of Lublin - he writes - that the Germans brought in ethnic Jews as the administrators for the town because Poles,though were  supposedly oppressed in the Russian Empire, could be  suspected of Russophilia, of sentiment of compassion, while Jews were  not, in fact he says it is "the race that hates Russia and Russians  most".  I thought that was a curious observation that somehow foretold  the events of the so-called Russian Revolution and echoes eerily with  our day, with today's anti-Russian propaganda and the frenzied industry  of Russophobia. The latter, I am afraid, that have ethnic root (and not necessarily Jewish as anyone familiar with the situation in Estonia  would testify).


The extent of outside Jewish hatred expressed for Russia through the controlled media in the so-called West, but primarily in America, or  through actions of state apparatus of subservient  entities like the  United States (I won't call it an independent nation) is to me frankly  puzzling. Why would that be the case? Russia is itself a state  controlled by a number of Jewish clans.  Another book tells how this  happened, the Jewish Century by Yuri Slezkine, Princeton University Press,  which is hardly anti-Semitic as the author is a  Soviet Jew and the book won a number of awards from Jewish organizations in the United States.  To me it looks like a match between two  clans of similar origins with traditional historic Russophobia mixed in, the Cohen's New York Times editorial is just a salvo in that ongoing  battle. 


Obviously not all foreign and domestic Jews are Russophobes but there is a trend one cannot just dismiss off hand like one cannot dismiss the  origins of the majority of so-called Russian bilionaires merely as a coincidence. But perhaps it is a coincidence. May be. 



By the way here is a curious article about Bolsheviks and their crimes in Russia: 

http://www.darkmoon.me/2011/crimes-of-the-bolsheviks-edited-by-isabella-fanfani 

all true but the comments, some of them written by obvious anti-Semites  are not large number of Bolshevik victims were Jewish including those whose  wealth was expropriated and there were numerous factors that allowed  Bolsheviks to succeed. 


A few notes on the Russian parliamentary elections.


The criminal Putinista junta would do anything to stay  in power.

There are reports of massive electroral violations in St. Petersburg  (like the commissioner in Kupchino,  one of the largest electoral  districts, left in unknown directions and took all the voter bulletins  with. Nothing is known. No electoral results announced.  St. Petersburg  is the most "normal" and well-behaving location in Russia - in the sense  of elections at least - one could just imagine what goes on in other  places.  A friend of mine who is in the loop told me that the United  Russia (a so-called party, though it has no ideology or electoral  platform of any kind) will steal 20% to 25% of votes.  As of this time 

the vote in St. Petersburg shows 29% share of the United States which  places their real "result" in something like 4% range.  Overall in  country the United Russia will attempt to break through 50% barrier  though in reality it would get about 30% of the vote. That what was  predicted and that is what is now happening. 



 

Russian Federation in Asia - according to the WikiNazis

I shared this message with literally a couple (two) friends but now thought would make it more public because the Orientalisation of Russia as pushed by the American enemy, the US officialdom and Academic is symptomatic, fairly new (picked up steam in the last 10 years or so) and persistent. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_registration_plate

WikiNazis following CIA and Washington Propaganda Ministry instructions push the notion of Russian Federation being entirely in Asia. This is a feature of now already old plan of Orientalisation of Russia (both Rosenberg's Nazi and post American). I left a comment in their discussion section but it will be deleted because Wikipedia "editors" delete everything disagreeable from their hilarioisly misnamed discussion pages.


Hi Wiki Nazis - why is the Russian Federation in Asia?  Wikipedia's own article on Russian Federation states that Russia covers 40% of Europe and is the largest European state with 80% of its population living in the European part of the country. Russia was always considered a European power - until last few years which were marked by a deliberate push on the part of Russia's  American enemy to change the perception - so why  put the whole thing in Asia?

A comment left for a Völkischer Beobachter propagandist

An American-Nazi bitch stationed appropriately in Berlin, in employ of   American Völkischer Beobachter the New York Times wrote this piece on "democratization of Russia" and EU Russian relations.

In it among all the outrageous and contradictory absurdities, the New York Times cunt claims that EU visa policy vis-a-vis Putinista Russian Federation may change something and push hopeless Russian Federation toward the path of salvation through conversation to the (subject to Washington approval) gods of democracy.

The piece begged for a critical comment which I of course left for the apparently literate cunt to read and enjoy:

Now, Cunt, tell me why would the rest of Europe or the mighty though bankrupt Fourth Reich itself (the U.S. of A.  that is) give a fuck about democratization of Russia but not, say, care even a bit about democracy or abysmal lack thereof in Singapore or Saudi Arabia? What about Qatar? Or even an EU member, the pesky ethno-Nazi statelet of Estonia where only people of right ethnicity are allowed to vote? That is frankly beyond me. Democratization of Russia (whatever that is) is a big issue but of Saudi Arabia is apparently not. Why is that?  I am not a Russian national though am of (half) Russian descent and this sort of Russophobe garbage that the rag that employs you is printing all over, week after week, year after year, puzzles me quite a bit.

Now, Cunt, come on, tell me how come visa barriers against helpless people (provided Russia is not a democracy, though of course it is more democratic than the USA but that's a different story altogether - and not that democracy is some kind of religion - but say Russia is not democratic hence its population can influence nothing as it has no say in anything) are of any value in promoting that phony democracy thing of yours at the time when under terms of EU-RF visa agreement all Russian officials and bureaucrats  can already travel to and throughout the EU visa-free, but ordinary people are subjected to humiliation and abuse by both their own and EU bureaucrats. Or why shouldn't EU or US punish Singaporean nationals just because their state is not a democracy but is in fact a one-party dictatorship? Or what about punishing Saudis, surely they routinely execute women by stoning on made up infidelity charges and there is not even a pretext of voting or of representative government, so what about them? And Russia is a fucking big deal -  that's not very logical or consistent or democratic, bitch, is it?

Roobit

The Homecoming of EU chickens

The most recent rounds of EU expansion- or the better medically-sounding term for this condition, the “enlargment”, is far more appropriate, were purely political undertakings ( actually perhaps not the most recents ones but all the new “acquistions” since 1990 except perhaps for EU’s Anschlüß with Austria). These acquisitions did not benefit the cause of the long term European unity. Some ethnofascist states were “adopted” as long as they were rabidly Russophobe and equally rabidly pro-American (apparently the only criteria that mattered at the time) like the tiny Nazi statelet of Estonia. Many long term political issues were unresolved, grievances and historic injustices (like the Benesch decrees in the Czech Republic) were not addressed. It was done because the EU really wanted the new members and little dwarfs that run it from behind the curtains thought that this is the historic moment and they are the collective Charlemagne or the Charlemagne collective. This whole thing was just hastily pushed through as if it were a land grab which I guess it was. It seems the best option for the present day EU would be to suffer a major catastrophe and die hopefully a not too painful death. A reform from within is something I wouldn’t expect though I do passionately believe in Easter bunny.

Being smoke free, no triumphant feelings

 Today is my third day without cigarettes.  It feels awful. I quit twice in the past. The longest I stayed smoke-free was for about a year. I also did not drink anything (anything worth drinking that is ) during that miserable year and yes stimulant-wise this period of self-induced ascetism was most abysmal. 

Why did I not drink? For me alcohol in any form is the most powerful smoking trigger I can think of. No drink, no smoke. On the other hand I enjoy drinking. There is no particular reason I quit this time. So why did I quit this time? My father does it perpetually. Now in his 60s, he quits intermittently, every second month or so he goes off the hook, then stays tobacco-free for a month or two and then lights up again. 


A few observations.

Smoking cessation guides of which there is a legion out on the Internet all claim that physical withdrawal symptoms disappear after 72 hours.  In reality, those symptoms got much worse.  Actually the first 24 hours were tolerable, the next 24 barely tolerable and the craving for a cigarette after 72 hours became almost unbearable.

I’ve got vast quantities of wine, whiskey, brandy stashed in the house and cigarette packs lay around all over.  

Lack of concentration -  it is next to impossible to concentrate on anything,. Even writing this sentence requires an enormous effort. I can’t see how I can do any kind of work in the next few days. Screw that. Perhaps doing menial tasks like laying bricks or driving one of my Fiats around, pointlessly while listening to something upbeat and inspiring might be the only sort of thing I can do now. Talking of upbeat and inspiring - just got a fabulous CD with a recording of Le Triomphe de la République, the 1792 work by François-Joseph Gossec, with Swiss Radio Choir, good stuff,  so beautifully French, so alien, so remote, so upbeat, so inspiring. On the CD cover there is a reproduction of a painting depicting some proud common man, un citoyen, someone who stood up in defense of the republic no doubt. The man is smoking a pipe.

A poll of the failed 1991 Soviet Union "coup"

Interesting opinion poll of the so-called coup of 1991 in Russia:
http://www.5-tv.ru/video/506466/

if time could be reversed, in 1991 would you:
1) man the barricades (support "democracy")
2) support the coup (support elemination of Gobrachev, Eltsin /Yeltsin and forcible if necessary restoration of the Soviet Union)
3) just stand aside - I don't care

1) 10%
2) 82%
3) 8%

Russian junta's love for all things German and the Little Nasty Dwarf to run a show race for anti-Russian statelet's presidency

The opinion poll (Levada center, 2011), use translate.google.com
http://www.levada.ru/press/2011060103.html

(http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ru&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.levada.ru%2Fpress%2F2011060103.html)

The results are clearly schizophrenic.

Out of five top "allies" the top  three - Kazakhstan, Belorussia and Ukraine - are parts of Russia, historic territories of the Russian state, separated as artificially created "national republics" during the long night of the Bolshevik captivity.

The fourth state is... Germany.

Something that I find hardly comprehensible or rather totally incomprehensible.

That entity - because the Federal Republic of Germany is the direct legal heir to the Prussian state, to the German empire and to the Nazi Third Reich (unlike the GDR which had explicitly nothing to do with those criminal entities) has a peculiar track record - it  destroyed Russian state in 1917 - something that was never restored, unleashed Communism on the Russian people, invaded Russia twice in the space of 40 years, unleashed Nazism, murdered more Russians than were otherwise killed or died from epidemics in the course of the world's entire history, destroyed vast number of cultural objects and landmarks, at a junction in time the criminal state of Germany was partitioned but  most tragically it was again re-united unconditionally by Gorbachev-Eltsin gang and as the ultimate gesture of ingratitude German leadership did everything to enlarge the EU with new anti-Russian statelets (especially the ethno-Nazi statelets in the Baltics), expand NATO (which was a German initiative), and support Islamist militancies in the Balkans and Caucasus: Germany has the largest Chechen population now, thanks to particularly receptive and openly anti-Russian asylum policies. German visas are among the most difficult to get for the Russian nationals - far worse than Spanish, French or Finnish Schengen visas. I would rank Germany as the most anti-Russian state in (old) Europe, after Britain and Sweden. Germany in today's form is however a new state (unlike say Austria), so I am unsure about placing it entirely with the old Europe (with Russia and France), perhaps its personality is split as it has a lot in common, spiritually at least, with the ethnostate which emerged on Europe's periphery in the course of the 20th century.

Although it was nominally democratic Czech(-oslovak with Slovak part being pretty much a nobody, not even the second fiddle) state committed horrific crimes against its German speaking citizens and indirectly against Germany, in Russia it was all the other way around as the number of Russian victims is disproportionate to German and Nazi ones. This said I find that Czech attitudes toward Germany today are far more reserved than what one sees in Russia, where jubilant and slavish Germanophilia is the norm especially when it comes to monstrous merchandise churned out by Teutonic industries.  An example would be the extraordinarily overpriced German Siemens   fast speed trains that run now on preposterous (from economic and societal perspective) Moscow to St. Petersburg route. Although the French built TGV and Italian  faster versions of FIAT Pendolino (the train unit is also owned by Alstom) offered to do the same for a fraction of the price and although unlike Siemens Alstom has experience of fast trains in Arctic (in Finland), the junta chose German because it was German. Likewise the junta created a cult of German car - both government and mafia (both are essentially the same in Russia) drive Mercedeses and BMWs - I can't see French president drive or rather be driven in a piece of German junk). Since Germany is a biological enemy of everything Russian, the choice to me is both puzzling and  revealing.

Name five countries which you might call the closest friends and  allies of  Russia ...? * (Responses ranged from last measurement)

	2005	2006	2007	2009	2010	2011
	V	V	VIII	III	V	V
Belorussia	46	47	38	50	49	35
Kazakhstan	20	33	39	38	32	33
Ukraine	17	10	11	3	20	21
Germany	23	22	24	17	24	20
China	12	24	19	18	16	18
India	16	15	14	12	14	16
Cuba	-	-	-	8	10	13
Armenia	9	14	15	15	15	11
France	13	8	9	9	11	9
Azerbaijan	5	7	5	10	8	9
Bulgaria	11	10	9	9	8	9
Italy	6	7	8	5	8	6
Venezuela	-	-	2	8	10	6
Kyrgyzstan	5	7	7	9	4	6
USA	11	5	6	2	7	5
Tajikistan	3	3	7	9	4	5
Egypt	2	1	2	2	2	5
No such	10	13	10	13	11	11
Difficult to answer	14	15	18	14	12	15

* Contains the first twenty countries in descending order


Here is how Belarussians view the world (2007, though I don't believe much changed since then), use translate.google.com
http://www.eurasianhome.org/xml/t/socials.xml?lang=ru/&nic=socials&pid=38



Despite massive propaganda campaign unseen since Stalin era and unprecedented monopolization of media attention, the "rating" of Russia's appointed   tyrant, Medvedev, is at humble 44% while Putin's inflated approval is at 49%, a figure I find myself difficult to believe in as it should hover somewhere in the low 10s.  I haven't met anyone who voted or would vote for the cockroach.

On top of that comes the news that two-bit tyrant Putin decided to put his phony candidacy up for mock elections.